Patrick Holford should need no introduction; but just in case he does, look here for the relevant story and here for all the background you'll ever need!
Submitted by Persiflage
Wednesday, October 17, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Submissions
Unmissable sites
Sceptics' WebRing
Labels
- acupuncture (1)
- bach (1)
- danie krugel (1)
- derek acorah (1)
- eated (2)
- electrosensitivity (2)
- fakery (3)
- fish oil (1)
- gillian mckeith (5)
- hahnemann (1)
- healing devices (1)
- homeopathy (12)
- hypnosis (1)
- jeni barnett (1)
- kinesiology (1)
- legal (1)
- lolrus (1)
- loltheism (4)
- mediums (1)
- memory of water (2)
- MMR (1)
- naturopathy (1)
- nutritionists (6)
- off-topic (3)
- patrick holford (1)
- paul mckenna (1)
- prince charles (1)
- quackery (2)
- reiki (1)
- spiritualism (1)
- uri geller (1)
Blog Archive
-
►
2007
(36)
-
►
October
(29)
- Quackwalrus... is not amused
- There is no spoon...
- Lassie is yesterday's news
- I'm sensing a disturbance in... your wallet
- When I get that feelin', I want... Reiki healing!...
- Hang on... HOW toxic are you?!
- You are feeling verrrrry... gullible....
- Doctor... Who?
- Neither hide nor hair
- You've all thought it, you know you have...
- Hi everybody!
- Truth in advertising
- Busy doin' nothin', busy the whole day through...
- Gone on to serve a higher power...
- One was so small, it was no cure at all...
- Kinesiology: a genuinely ancient art...
- Needles and pins...
- Papal inflatability...
- Makin' ur kidz clevuh
- Krugel and unusual punishment
- Makin u feel bettuh
- Dr. Edward Bach...
- Royal blues...
- Braaaaaaains!
- I'm feeling better already!
- Eating healthily is FUN!
- Evil Wireless Death Rays (TM) are coming for you!
- No, Gillian, you can't...
- Good old Sam Hahnemann - where would we be without...
-
►
October
(29)
Anti-Quackery Webring
Disclaimer
Widgety placeholder thingy
3 comments:
That is a disgraceful and libellous photograph. We demand that it be changed to one showing our client with his extensive range of Patrick Holford TM supplements.
The Holford Legal Team - we're watching YOU
Dear Holford Legal Team,
I'm afraid that I cannot take you seriously until you correct the typographical error in your letter:
"...changed to one showing our client with his extensive range..."
You see? The penultimate word in the phrase quoted above mistakenly contains a "t" instead of a "p"; are you sure you're really lawyers?
Yrs &c.,
Persiflage
Dear Non-believer,
We are of course Britain's leading solicitors in the same way that Professor Patrick Holford (visiting) Dip ION (hon) is the same that Patrick Holford is Britain's leading ... errr ... entrepreneur.
You are correct that our client has a very expensive range of pills, sorry supplements. This is to fund essential overheads such as public relations consultants to monitor Wikipedia and solicitors to deal with shall we say unkind remarks from those jealous of his resounding success in life. After all the proles can go to Holland & Barrett or Tesco can't they?
Now on pain of being sued we challenge you to find five things wrong with our client. Ten things RIGHT with him include:
(1) supplements do no harm (Okay, there was study saying the contrary but that was produced by a bunch jealous left-wing extremists.)
(2) he is not influenced by pharmeceutical companies, dieticians, doctors, or scientists
(3) he likes rabbits
(4) he is very nice man
(5) he is very ethical, moral and honest
(6) he is the messiah
(7) errr
(8) ummm
(9) that's it
Sue, Grabbit & Runn - solicitors for ducks
Post a Comment